NucesRate logo
Β© NucesRate, Inc.
  • About

  • |

  • Privacy Policy

  • |

  • Terms of Service

Professor Image

Mr. Aamir Raheem

Computing
( 1.26 )

( Average rating based on student feedback )

Total Reviews(27)

Sort by
Jul 05, 2025
approved

l21***4@lhr.nu.edu.pk

Hope he sees this.

πŸŒ€ Confusing Lectures
πŸ“‰ Discourages Scaling
❌ Does Not Give Bonus
βš–οΈ Grading Is Biased
πŸ›‘ Lacks Subject Expertise
😐 Minimal Student Interaction
Jun 12, 2025
approved

l23***5@lhr.nu.edu.pk

didnt taugth anything properly so unfair checking and grading doesnt know how to teach or manage class

πŸŒ€ Confusing Lectures
βš–οΈ Grading Is Biased
πŸ›‘ Lacks Subject Expertise
❓ Unclear Explanations
Jun 05, 2025
approved

l22***1@lhr.nu.edu.pk

Apr 25, 2025
approved

l22***2@lhr.nu.edu.pk

Avoid this teacher at all costs lazy checking takes forever to check mids and gives no justification on deducting the marks.

Mar 19, 2025
approved

l22***9@lhr.nu.edu.pk

One of if not the worst teachers at fast lazy and dull teaching style , favouritism and bad marking due to personal grudges

Jan 26, 2025
approved

l22***4@lhr.nu.edu.pk

outdated. also inn ki class mein neend bohot aati. Grade tou ajaye ga but bohot basic parhate.

Jan 17, 2025
approved

l22***1@lhr.nu.edu.pk

He is average in class management and knows his course well, but his grading is biased. He gave 3 CP marks to front-row students or those he remembers, while others got 1. When students complained about unfair grades, he told them to fill out a rechecking form first.

βš–οΈ Grading Is Biased
πŸ’” Lacks Empathy
🚨 Unethical Behaviour
Jan 16, 2025
rejected

l22***5@lhr.nu.edu.pk

Content is hidden for rejected review

Comment is hidden due to policy violation!

Jan 14, 2025
rejected

l21***8@lhr.nu.edu.pk

Content is hidden for rejected review

Comment is hidden due to policy violation!

Jan 13, 2025
approved

l22***2@lhr.nu.edu.pk

Jan 13, 2025
approved

l21***0@lhr.nu.edu.pk

Jan 13, 2025
approved

l22***6@lhr.nu.edu.pk

He have good teaching skills BUT he is best example of random marking and favoritism. He literally didn't listen to anyone.

Jan 13, 2025
approved

l22***0@lhr.nu.edu.pk

Poor teaching skills and lacked clarity in his lectures. Demonstrated favoritism throughout the semester, and very unfair & biased marking.

Jan 13, 2025
approved

l22***9@lhr.nu.edu.pk

His teaching style is very boring. Also, he promotes favouritism. The marking is also biased

πŸ“’ Needs Better Communication
πŸ™ Needs to Be More Polite
🌱 Needs to Improve Confidence
πŸ”• Poor Classroom Control
Jan 13, 2025
approved

l22***9@lhr.nu.edu.pk

People like him shouldn’t be allowed to teach. He would literally look at walls and ceiling rather than looking at you during rechecking.

πŸ’” Lacks Empathy
πŸ”• Poor Classroom Control
🚨 Unethical Behaviour
Jan 13, 2025
approved

l22***0@lhr.nu.edu.pk

Before attending his lectures, my OOP concepts were poor. Thanks to his chill & relaxed teaching style (or maybe SDA was just that easy), by the semester's end, these concepts truly clicked. He was the first teacher to never rush through lectures, making it easier to grasp the material.

πŸ’‘ Clear and Organized Lectures
πŸ€— Friendly Behaviour
🌟 Inspiring & Positive
🀝 Interactive Teaching Style
πŸ•°οΈ Punctual & Time-Efficient
πŸ§˜β€β™‚οΈ Stress-Free Environment
Jan 11, 2025
approved

l22***5@lhr.nu.edu.pk

Biased checking Doesn't know how to teach Favouritism

πŸ“‰ Discourages Scaling
❌ Does Not Give Bonus
βš–οΈ Grading Is Biased
πŸ›‘ Lacks Subject Expertise
Jan 11, 2025
approved

l22***7@lhr.nu.edu.pk

This teacher demonstrates clear favoritism in grading, which raises concerns about fairness and professionalism. For instance, he allocated 3 marks for class participation but awarded the full marks to only 2 or 3 students, disregarding the efforts of others. This approach demotivates students who contribute but are not recognized.

βš–οΈ Grading Is Biased
Jan 10, 2025
approved

l22***1@lhr.nu.edu.pk

Jan 10, 2025
approved

l22***1@lhr.nu.edu.pk

He shouldn't be a teacher.

πŸ“‰ Discourages Scaling
βš–οΈ Grading Is Biased
❓ Unclear Explanations
Jan 10, 2025
approved

l22***9@lhr.nu.edu.pk

Jan 10, 2025
approved

l21***9@lhr.nu.edu.pk

Unfair marking, doesn’t teach good at all. He also do favouritism sometimes and doesn’t listen to students in rechecking of exams at all. His given marks are full and final, you can never challenge them.

Jan 09, 2025
approved

l21***7@lhr.nu.edu.pk

Very good teaching skills with really unfair grading

Jan 09, 2025
approved

l22***6@lhr.nu.edu.pk

Best example of favouritism, use random marking, different marks for same solution. For maintaining class average he can give low marks to any student. Teaching skill is below average.

βš–οΈ Grading Is Biased
Jan 10, 2025
approved

l22***5@lhr.nu.edu.pk

Zindagi se uqtae hue hain or class participation men puri class ko 1/3 dia hai. IRONIC. Doesn't listen to anyone during rechecking. Rechecking krte hi kyun hai phir

⏳ Flexible Deadlines
❓ Unclear Explanations
Jan 08, 2025
approved

l23***8@lhr.nu.edu.pk

Inko parhana sai ata hai lekin parhatay nai thay

Jan 08, 2025
approved

l23***1@lhr.nu.edu.pk

Poor teaching. Too easy assignments (more like lab manuals). Fairly strict checking.

πŸ“ Easy Quizzes
πŸ“ˆ Encourages Scaling
πŸ“’ Needs Better Communication